rg767 wrote:Its whether we wish to be part of the next great extinction or not when the natural systems we depend upon are no longer reliable.
rg767 wrote:The point is that the climate as it stands is eminently useful to us, and has allowed all of life to begin and prosper in the form that we know it.
Your comment about not being able to change it is cynical at best. We clearly already have changed almost everything.
What I don't get is if you think it is rubbish, and don't think it matters anyway even if we are on a course to extinction or not, why do you care enough to argue?
rg767 wrote:No, you may not comprehend it, but all that does it count you out of a meaningful discussion. A discussion I would invite anyone here to have with bona fide experts. The truth is that you wouldn't know where to start in that discussion, and you refuse to have it. You refuse to look at any evidence - don't go to the IPCC (even though you don't even understand their function), go to Realclimate. They will answer your posts.
We have altered the climate through various means, although I never said that have have altered it for our benefit: you added that.
We have accidentally altered the climate to our disbenefit, and the way we alter it back is by attempting to rectify the mistakes that we have made. If we are lucky, and quick.
You keep saying there is no evidence, again I say to you go and argue your point with some scientists, because the overwhelming body of evidence clearly shows otherwise, and you provide nothing but blanket denial.
Thats not skepticism, that's just denial, and it puts you in the company of big tobacco, et al.
rg767 wrote:Joey your post is extremely ignorant. Have your opinion, but don't bother addressing anything my way again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest