When I mentioned that a GST registered entity (supplying solar power) should be able to be paid 60c Plus GST, the accountant acknowledged that if there was enough interest from customers, then a special tariff of 60c plus GST could be put into the system, and if people (solar suppliers) prove they are registered for GST to CE, they could be put on the new tariff of 66c.
Yes, they might be paid GST, but they would be collecting it for the taxman
- not pocketing it themselves? so why bother?
And if its a product or service then being sold commercially by that GST registered entity (ie as their GST registered product/service), then equally the Tax man might revisit the treatment of the payment and credits as taxable income? so not neccessarily a great win to have fought for?
I understand for residential customers the GST treatment on the bill is:
you Buy $200 of Energy (a product or service that attracts GST from a GST registered supplier)
you owe the taxman $20 of GST
You generate $100 of Export (and are not registered to collect GST) so you have no GST to charge the Retailer (and give to the taxman)
BUT - you end up paying the difference of $100 to the retailer, but still with $20 of GST to go to the taxman.
Fair and equitable!
most people wanting to charge GST think they get to keep the extra 10% in their pocket - not so!
You cannot collect GST if your not registered to do so.
You cannot be registered, and keep it! your simply a tax collector via the BAS statements, you do get to offset your incoming GST against outgoing GST but you wont get that for $100 of Export a year!
regards
Sojin Muneshi